91桃色

Journal of Medical Implants & Surgery
Open 91桃色

Our Group organises 3000+ Global Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open 91桃色 Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

Open 91桃色 Journals gaining more Readers and Citations
700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers

This Readership is 10 times more when compared to other Subscription Journals (Source: Google Analytics)
  • Proceedings   
  • J Med Imp Surg 9: 209, Vol 9(1)
  • DOI: 10.4172/jmis.1000209

Orthopedic Robotics: Enhancing Surgical Precision and Improving Patient Outcomes

Kuzmina Claudia*
Department of Biotechnology and Physical Chemistry, Cracow University of Technology, Poland
*Corresponding Author: Kuzmina Claudia, Department of Biotechnology and Physical Chemistry, Cracow University of Technology, Poland, Email: kuzminacdia@gmail.com

Received: 01-Jan-2024 / Manuscript No. jmis-25-160835 / Editor assigned: 03-Jan-2024 / PreQC No. jmis-25-160835 (PQ) / Reviewed: 17-Jan-2024 / QC No. jmis-25-160835 / Revised: 22-Jan-2024 / Manuscript No. jmis-25-160835 (R) / Published Date: 29-Jan-2024 DOI: 10.4172/jmis.1000209

Introduction

Orthopedic surgery has undergone significant advancements over the past few decades, with technology playing a pivotal role in transforming surgical practices. Among these innovations, robotic-assisted surgery has emerged as one of the most promising developments in the field of orthopedics. By incorporating advanced robotics, imaging systems, and artificial intelligence (AI), orthopedic robots offer surgeons enhanced precision, improved surgical outcomes, and minimized invasiveness. These systems are designed to aid in procedures such as joint replacements, spinal surgeries, and complex fracture repairs, allowing for personalized treatment plans and a more tailored approach to surgery [1]. The integration of robotic technologies has not only improved the accuracy of implant placements and surgical interventions but has also contributed to faster recovery times and a reduction in postoperative complications. Despite the increasing adoption of robotic systems in orthopedic surgeries, challenges such as high costs, surgeon training, and system reliability remain. This article delves into the various orthopedic robotic technologies currently in use, reviews their clinical applications, and examines the outcomes that have been achieved through robotic-assisted procedures [2-5]. The objective is to provide a comprehensive overview of orthopedic robotics and discuss its potential to revolutionize surgical practices and patient care.

Methodology

To assess the current landscape of orthopedic robotics, a systematic review of recent studies, clinical trials, and technological advancements in robotic-assisted orthopedic surgeries was conducted. The following methodology was used:
  • Literature review: A thorough review of existing literature was performed using electronic databases such as PubMed, Google Scholar, and Science Direct [6]. Keywords such as orthopedic robotics, robotic-assisted surgery, joint replacement, spinal surgery robotics, and AI in orthopedics were used to identify relevant articles published in the past five years [7]. The focus was on peer-reviewed studies, clinical trials, and technical reports.
  • Analysis: The data from the studies were analyzed to identify trends and patterns in the outcomes of robotic-assisted surgeries [8, 9]. This included comparing robotic systems' effectiveness in various orthopedic applications, assessing their clinical impact, and discussing patient satisfaction and cost-effectiveness. Expert opinions interviews with orthopedic surgeons and robotic system manufacturers were conducted to gather insights into the practical implementation of robotic technologies, challenges faced in the clinical setting, and future trends in robotic surgery [10].

Conclusion

Orthopedic robotics has emerged as a transformative force in modern surgery, offering enhanced precision, improved surgical outcomes, and significant benefits for patients. Robotic-assisted systems, integrated with advanced imaging technologies and artificial intelligence, enable orthopedic surgeons to perform procedures with greater accuracy, particularly in joint replacements, spinal surgeries, and complex fracture repairs. The ability to create personalized surgical plans based on real-time data has improved the overall effectiveness of surgeries, leading to quicker recovery times, reduced complication rates, and better long-term results. Despite the promising advantages, challenges such as high initial costs, the need for specialized training, and the integration of robotic systems into existing surgical workflows remain. However, with continuous advancements in robotic technology, these barriers are expected to decrease over time, making robotic-assisted orthopedic surgeries more accessible and cost-effective. Additionally, the growing role of artificial intelligence and machine learning in refining surgical techniques and decision-making further enhances the potential for orthopedic robotics to revolutionize patient care. In the future, the expansion of robotic-assisted surgery in orthopedics will likely lead to even greater innovations, such as minimally invasive procedures, improved patient-tailored treatments, and the integration of augmented reality (AR) for real-time surgical navigation. The continued development and refinement of robotic technologies, along with the increasing adoption of AI and machine learning, promise to further elevate the precision and safety of orthopedic surgeries, ultimately transforming the way orthopedic conditions are treated worldwide.

Acknowledgement

None

Conflict of Interest

None

Reference

  1. Jones J, Antony AK (2019). Gland surg 8: 53-60.
  2. , ,

  3. Sinnott J, Persing S, Pronovost M (2018)Ann Surg Oncol 25: 2899-2908.
  4. , ,

  5. Potter S, Conroy EJ, Cutress RI (2019). Lancet Oncol 20: 254-266.
  6. , ,

  7. Jeevan R, Cromwell DA, Browne JP (2014). Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 67: 1333-1344.
  8. , ,

  9. Casella D, Calabrese C, Bianchi S (2015)Plast Recontr Surg Glob Open 3: 577.
  10. , ,

  11. Vidya R, Masila J, Cawthorn S (2017). Breast J 23: 670-676.
  12. , ,

  13. Hansson E, Edvinsson Ach, Elander A (2021). J Surg Oncol 123: 80-88.
  14. , ,

  15. Thorarinson A, Frojd V, Kolby L (2017)Gland Surg 6: 355-367.
  16. , ,

  17. Srinivasa D, Holland M, Sbitany H (2019)Gland Surg 8: 19-26.
  18. , ,

  19. Chatterjee A, Nahabedian MY, Gabriel A (2018). J Surg Oncol 117: 1119-1130.
  20. , ,

Post Your Comment Citation
Share This Article
Recommended Conferences

Toronto, Canada
Article Tools
Article Usage
  • Total views: 313
  • [From(publication date): 0-0 - Apr 24, 2025]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views: 142
  • PDF downloads: 171
International Conferences 2025-26
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global

Conferences by Country

Medical & Clinical Conferences

Conferences By Subject

Top